Invoice factoring vs MCA

Invoice factoring vs merchant cash advances for US businesses

Invoice Factoring at 1%–5% (discount fee) against Merchant Cash Advances at 15%–40% (factor fee), compared across 40 US providers on cost, term, speed, and eligibility.

For US businesses weighing receivables financing against a revenue-linked advance, and advisors explaining the difference.

How these figures are compiled
Published positions at a glance. Figures are indicative ranges, not quotes.
DimensionInvoice FactoringMerchant Cash Advances
Published cost1%–5%15%–40%
What the cost measuresDiscount feeFactor fee
Typical termPer trade cycle3–18 months
Fastest published funding24 hours24 hours
Lowest published FICO minimumNot published600
Median published revenue floor$300,000$120,000
Shortest published trading historyNot published4 months
Providers compared2020
Selected Invoice Factoring and Merchant Cash Advances providers in the United States, lowest published cost first within each product
ProviderProductPublished costWhat it measuresTermFunding speedPublished criteria
AltLineInvoice Factoring1%–3%Discount feePer trade cycle48 hoursPublished criteria do not state a minimum revenue, trading history, or credit score.
American ReceivableInvoice Factoring1%–3%Discount feePer trade cycle24 hoursRequires $120,000+ in annual revenue.
Bankers FactoringInvoice Factoring1%–2.5%Discount feePer invoice, non-recourse3–5 business daysRequires $300,000+ in annual revenue.
DSA FactorsInvoice Factoring1%–3%Discount feePer trade cycle24–48 hoursPublished criteria do not state a minimum revenue, trading history, or credit score.
eCapitalInvoice Factoring1%–3%Discount feePer trade cycle24–48 hoursPublished criteria do not state a minimum revenue, trading history, or credit score.
Paragon FinancialInvoice Factoring1%–3%Discount feePer trade cycle24–48 hoursRequires $300,000+ in annual revenue.
Prestige CapitalInvoice Factoring1%–2.5%Discount feePer trade cycle3–5 business daysRequires $1.2M+ in annual revenue.
TCI Business CapitalInvoice Factoring1%–3%Discount feePer trade cycle24–48 hoursRequires $600,000+ in annual revenue.
Bitty AdvanceMerchant Cash Advances15%–30%Factor fee3–12 months24–48 hoursRequires at least 4 months in business and $60,000+ in annual revenue.
CrediblyMerchant Cash Advances15%–35%Factor fee6–15 months24–48 hoursRequires at least 6 months in business and $180,000+ in annual revenue.
Fora FinancialMerchant Cash Advances15%–35%Factor fee4–15 months24–48 hoursRequires at least 6 months in business and $180,000+ in annual revenue.
Libertas FundingMerchant Cash Advances15%–32%Factor fee6–18 months48 hours to 1 weekRequires at least 2 years in business and $600,000+ in annual revenue.
Mulligan FundingMerchant Cash Advances15%–35%Factor fee4–18 months24–48 hoursRequires at least 1 year in business and $120,000+ in annual revenue.
Rapid FinanceMerchant Cash Advances15%–38%Factor fee3–18 months24–48 hoursRequires at least 1 year in business and $120,000+ in annual revenue.
FundkiteMerchant Cash Advances18%–38%Factor fee3–15 months24–48 hoursRequires at least 6 months in business and $120,000+ in annual revenue.
Headway Capital MCAMerchant Cash Advances18%–35%Factor fee4–15 months24–48 hoursRequires at least 1 year in business, $50,000+ in annual revenue and a 600+ FICO score.

These costs are quoted on different bases and are not directly comparable

Discount fee
Charged per invoice or trade cycle rather than per year. A fee that looks small can annualise into a much larger number when cycles repeat through the year.
Factor fee
A fee on the total advanced, not an annual rate. Because it is charged in full over a repayment period shorter than a year, the equivalent annualised cost is materially higher than the number shown.

What actually separates them

These two are frequently presented as alternatives because both convert future income into cash now and both fund quickly. Structurally they are quite different. Factoring sells a specific invoice at a discount, so the funding is tied to work already delivered to a named customer whose creditworthiness the provider assesses. A merchant cash advance buys a share of future receipts, so it is tied to expected revenue that has not been earned yet.

That difference determines who carries the risk. In factoring, particularly on a non-recourse basis, the provider takes a view on the debtor. In an advance, the exposure sits with the business itself, and repayment is drawn from daily or weekly receipts regardless of whether any particular customer pays. A business with concentrated, creditworthy receivables and a business with diffuse card revenue are not choosing between equivalent options.

  • Invoice Factoring: 1%–5% (discount fee)
  • Merchant Cash Advances: 15%–40% (factor fee)
  • Invoice Factoring term: Per trade cycle
  • Merchant Cash Advances term: 3–18 months

Why the headline numbers cannot be compared directly

The two products are quoted on different bases, which is the most common source of error when businesses weigh them against each other. The cost of invoice factoring is quoted as a discount fee: Charged per invoice or trade cycle rather than per year. A fee that looks small can annualise into a much larger number when cycles repeat through the year. The cost of merchant cash advances is quoted as a factor fee: A fee on the total advanced, not an annual rate. Because it is charged in full over a repayment period shorter than a year, the equivalent annualised cost is materially higher than the number shown.

Set side by side without that context, 1%–5% and 15%–40% appear to be the same kind of quantity. They are not. Converting either into a comparable annualised figure requires the drawn amount, the actual repayment period, and the full fee schedule — none of which appear in a published range. Any comparison that skips this step will reach a confident conclusion that happens to be wrong.

  • Discount fee: Charged per invoice or trade cycle rather than per year. A fee that looks small can annualise into a much larger number when cycles repeat through the year.
  • Factor fee: A fee on the total advanced, not an annual rate. Because it is charged in full over a repayment period shorter than a year, the equivalent annualised cost is materially higher than the number shown.

When each one fits

Factoring tends to fit where revenue is invoiced to established commercial customers on payment terms, where the constraint is the gap between delivery and payment rather than demand, and where the customer base is creditworthy enough for a provider to underwrite it. It works poorly for consumer-facing businesses with no receivables ledger.

An advance tends to fit where revenue arrives continuously through card or platform receipts, where there is no invoice to sell, and where speed matters more than cost. Its repayment mechanism — a share of daily receipts — flexes with trading, which helps in a slow month and compounds the cost of a long one.

Before choosing between them

The most consequential difference is not the headline number but the repayment mechanism. Daily or weekly remittance against receipts affects working capital continuously, and businesses that model it as a monthly payment routinely underestimate the pressure it puts on operating cash.

Caplift's assessment compares structures on a consistent basis using the business's own figures rather than published ranges, and produces a readiness view alongside it. Caplift is not a lender and does not approve, originate, or guarantee financing — the decision remains with the business and its advisors.

Common questions

Questions businesses ask

Is invoice factoring cheaper than merchant cash advances?

The published figures — 1%–5% for invoice factoring and 15%–40% for merchant cash advances — are quoted on different bases and cannot be compared directly. Discount fee and factor fee measure different things over different periods, so the smaller number is not reliably the cheaper facility.

Which funds faster, invoice factoring or merchant cash advances?

The fastest published timeline is 24 hours for invoice factoring and 24 hours for merchant cash advances. Published timelines assume a complete file and exclude the preparation time before submission, which is usually the larger part of the calendar.

Which has easier eligibility requirements?

Across the providers compared here, the lowest published FICO minimum is not published for invoice factoring and 600 for merchant cash advances. Published minimums gate consideration only — approval depends on the whole file, and an easier published threshold usually corresponds to a higher cost or a tighter structure elsewhere.

Does Caplift lend or earn a fee from either product?

No. Caplift Financial Inc. is software and is not a lender. Providers are compared from published information, inclusion is not an endorsement, and appearing here does not indicate a commercial relationship with Caplift.

About this data, and its limits

  • Figures are drawn from Caplift's Q1 2026 lender catalogue review and are indicative, not quotes. Curated from named US lenders; confirm individual terms before relying on them.
  • Compared across 20 invoice factoring providers and 20 merchant cash advances providers that publish indicative pricing. The provider table below shows the lowest-cost eight from each product; the full sets appear on the individual product guides.
  • Inclusion is not an endorsement, a recommendation, or an offer, and does not indicate a commercial relationship with Caplift. Pricing and criteria change without notice — confirm current terms directly with the provider before relying on them.
  • Caplift compiles this information to the best of its ability from publicly available provider material, but does not guarantee that it is accurate, complete, or current, and accepts no liability for decisions made in reliance on it. Figures may be out of date or incorrect. Verify anything you intend to act on directly with the provider.
  • Caplift Financial Inc. is not a lender and does not approve, originate, or guarantee financing. Nothing on this page is legal, financial, tax, accounting, or investment advice, and it should not be treated as a substitute for advice from a qualified professional who knows your circumstances.
Disclosures: Caplift provides software, workflow support, and informational outputs. Final financing, investment, and compliance decisions require human review.